In a clause stipulating that architects agree to “ensure during the progress of the work that the owner or owners keep the drawings produced up to date,” the guide states that the word “insurance” means providing a guarantee and that guarantees cannot be insured as part of the professional liability insurance. Instead, it is recommended to replace formulations such as “assist in” or “require.” Architects are often asked to sign contracts established by the client for architectural services or a standard contract form, such as DOCUMENT SIX, but are modified by additional client-generated conditions that may violate provincial rules. An architect is always advised to seek both legal assistance and insurance advice before contracting. This is all the more important if the contract departs from a standard agreement approved by the RAIC or a provincial or territorial regulator. Earlier this summer, the Ontario Architects Association (OAA) launched practical advice to help architects decipher the language of PSRs and client-architect contracts. While the OAA guide is aimed at Ontario architects, it can be a useful reference for architects in a larger area facing similar challenges. The Ontario Architects Association (OAA) has developed a new comprehensive practice bulletin to help architects in their efforts to secure fair and balanced contracts. Best practices for verifying the RFP language and the complementary terms of the OAA 600 and other client architect contracts contain detailed information on the verification of documents and contracts. END HERE, rest in Link In recent years, architects have been pressed to sign contracts containing several pages with complementary conditions that often deviate from the usual practice of architecture.
In 2015, I led a sign on navigating these contracts and published some tips that resulted in a follow-up essay. The guide provides specific examples of formulations that should be most concerned with DPD and contract review practices, and offers alternative language. Reading about legal language may not be everyone`s thing, but I found this guide excellent. It provides a clear and consistent guide for some of the language that have appeared in the massive additional conditions documents that now accompany many contracts.Leave a reply →